Updated Sunday, January 6, 2013 at 02:16 AM
KAJAKI, Afghanistan — In the approaching twilight of its war in Afghanistan, the U.S. is forging ahead with a giant infrastructure project long criticized as too costly in blood and money.
It’s a $500 million effort to refurbish the massive Kajaki dam and hydroelectric power system with an extensive network of power lines and transmission substations. It is supposed to bring electricity to 332,000 people in southern Afghanistan, increase crop yields and build a cohort of trained Afghan laborers in a region in need of them.
But completion, originally envisaged for 2005, now is projected for 2015, the year after most foreign combat troops will have left the country.
There are also some crucial ifs:
If a convoy carrying 900 tons of cement can make it up a dangerous road to the dam site without being attacked by the Taliban. If the Afghan army can hold out in an area that took thousands of U.S. Marines to secure. If the Afghan government can take on the management of the dam.
“It’s a long-term bet. I’ve said to people: We have to be patient and we have to persevere,” said Ken Yamashita, head of USAID in Afghanistan.
The desire to succeed is understandable. The Kajaki dam on the Helmand River symbolizes for the Afghans and their U.S. backers what they had hoped the infusion of U.S. troops and cash would produce nationwide: an Afghan government that can provide for its people and in turn count on its support against the Taliban insurgency.
The U.S. has spent $22.34 billion on governance and development in Afghanistan since it invaded the country after the Sept. 11 attacks, much of that on projects to build roads, schools, power plants and irrigation systems. In the past two years, $800 million was earmarked for infrastructure projects.
Kajaki is also a symbol of the U.S. presence in Afghanistan dating back to the 1950s and the Cold War. That was when the U.S. built the original dam, with a powerhouse added in the 1970s. But before the three turbines could be installed, the Soviets invaded and construction stopped. The dam was still squeezing out a bit of power in 2001, when the U.S. attacked and, ironically enough, bombed the dam’s power-transmission line.
In the latest phase of the Kajaki saga, fighting and limited oversight of spending have led to huge delays and cost overruns. Now Helmand province, home of the dam, is seeing the first and largest wave of U.S. troop reductions, with 10,000 of 17,000 U.S. Marines already gone. That means most of the Kajaki project is going forward with Afghan forces providing nearly all the security in an area that was a Taliban stronghold until a year ago.
Afghans are already hedging their bets.
The number of workers on a U.S.-funded construction project next to Kajaki has dwindled from 200 to 20 since last fall, and those remaining say workers feel the risk isn’t worth the $6 daily paycheck.
“They can’t come here because all the routes to the district are controlled by the Taliban,” said Abdul Razziq, 28, a villager working on construction of a new district government center next to the dam.
His family supports the government, so he at least doesn’t have to lie to keep his place of work secret. Not so Timur Shah, who spends a couple of months at a time working at Kajaki. “My immediate family knows I am here. But if anyone else asks they will make something up,” he said.
Shah said security improved when U.S. Marines flooded the province, but is deteriorating as the Marines leave.
“Just at the time the American forces started leaving here, the Taliban started to appear again, in the whole area,” Shah said.
Cellphone service also stopped working in Kajaki district in late fall. It is common for insurgents to disrupt service in areas they control, though the construction workers say they’re just as ready to believe the Americans blocked the calls.
U.S. officials say the wariness is to be expected. They point out that Afghan security forces have increased their presence around the dam and that attacks, while regular, appear to be decreasing.
“There’s an ebb and flow,” said Marine Capt. Glen Baker, one of a small group of Marines that continues to hold an outpost in Kajaki and advise Afghan forces in the area. “There was an increase when the Marines pulled out and there has been a decrease subsequently.”
The company working on building the dam has also been able this year to send supplies via road; four convoys of trucks have made the trip without incident. Previously, equipment was being helicoptered in at enormous cost.
The core of the project is the installation of a third power-generating turbine at the dam, an effort planned since 2002. The installation was originally budgeted at $18 million. Now it is getting an additional $85 million and is scheduled to be installed in March.
Many in Afghanistan have given up on Kajaki.
“It is 10 years now that Kajaki dam has been as it is. Too much money has been spent there in the name of reconstruction ... all of that money wasted,” President Hamid Karzai said in December.
Even if the project overcomes the security and logistical barriers, there are questions about whether it’s worth the cost.
The dam can’t provide enough power to sustain the main city in the region — Kandahar — and the price tag is steep for the extra irrigation it brings to the Helmand River valley.
There are also signs of the difficulties the Afghan government may face when it takes over management of the dam.
One area already controlled by the Afghans is the management of irrigation water. The water has to hold to a certain level through the winter to keep electricity flowing, but last year the manager in charge of irrigation yielded to pressure from farmers and kept the water valve open.
“He ignored the need to close it in September. So the level of water was reduced,” said Shaqib Nassar, the utility’s chief operations officer, which oversees the dam. As a result the dam can only produce 24 megawatts, rather than 33 megawatts, he explained.
And the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction, the U.S. government watchdog for spending in the country, said in a report in December that $12.8 million in electricity-distribution equipment provided to the Afghan energy utility in Kandahar was unused because the Afghan staff “lacked the technical and operational capacity to properly install and manage it.” The Kandahar utility also oversees Kajaki dam.
As recently as mid-2012, the U.S. was considering scrapping the whole project and switching the money to less unwieldy projects. Then it doubled down.
“Several months back we had a lot of discussion about whether continued investment in this would be worthwhile,” said Yamashita, the USAID official. “In the end, the discussion and the conclusion was that the output of electricity plus the development programs in the Helmand valley, plus the security it brings, equals a risk worth taking.”
The Associated PressAP
A U.S. Marine, left, looks down a hole in a tunnel used in the construction of the Kajaki dam in Helmand province, south of Kabul, Afghanistan.