The Seattle Times. Winner of Eight Pulitzer Prizes.


Thu, Aug 28, 2014

WEATHER | TRAFFIC

VIEW SECTIONS

Home


Updated Friday, December 21, 2012 at 01:50 PM

Britain raises bar on social-media arrests

By Henry Chu
Los Angeles Times

LONDON — People who post offensive messages on social networks such as Facebook and Twitter should face criminal charges only if their comments are harassing or threatening and not simply in bad taste, according to new legal guidelines in Britain that follow a spate of controversial prosecutions.

Free-speech advocates have been alarmed in recent months by a number of incidents in which users of social media have been arrested and jailed for posting messages that others deemed repugnant. A 2003 law authorizes such punishment for “indecent, obscene or menacing” communications sent through a public electronic network.

But the law predates the explosion of such new media as Twitter and Facebook, and some police officials say that having to investigate the growing number of complaints about offensive messages is distracting them from more serious work.

Keir Starmer, chief prosecutor for England and Wales, said the new guidelines from his office would raise the bar for criminal charges under the 2003 law by limiting most prosecutions to cases involving threatening and intimidating remarks targeted at specific individuals. That would help protect freedom of expression while allowing authorities to crack down where warranted, he said.

“There are millions of messages sent by social media every day, and if only a small percentage of those millions are deemed to be offensive, then there’s the potential for very many cases coming before our courts,” Starmer told BBC radio. “So we need a sensible way of dividing the messages into those which are more likely to be prosecuted — the threats and the harassment and the breach of court orders — and those that aren’t — the deeply unpopular, the shocking, the grossly offensive.”

Under the guidelines, most if not all of a recent rash of high-profile cases would probably not have been prosecuted, including one involving a youth who was sent to jail for 12 weeks for posting crude jokes about two kidnapped girls.

Critics of the prosecutions noted such comments might raise eyebrows and draw disapproving looks if spoken aloud in a pub, but online they suddenly become criminal offenses. Civil-liberties activists warned of a chilling effect on free speech.

Starmer agreed, and consulted lawyers, police and other experts on setting a higher threshold for prosecution. The guidelines go into effect immediately but will be reviewed in March after the public has had a chance to offer its input.

“It would be stifling free speech if people thought that every time they communicated something which might be deeply offensive or deeply unpopular ... then the police were likely to get involved,” Starmer said.


SECTIONS

Top News arrow

Latest News arrow

Local arrow

Nation & World arrow

Business & Technology arrow

Editorial & Opinion arrow

Sports arrow

Entertainment arrow

Living arrow

Travel & Outdoors arrow

Obituaries arrow


CLASSIFIEDS

Jobs arrow

Autos arrow

Homes & Rentals arrow

More Classifieds arrow